Known Inconsistencies
Published errors and internal contradictions are preserved rather than silently repaired.
- Published claims are preserved as page content and are not silently converted into independently verified findings.
- The page spells the boy’s name ‘Elliot’ throughout the visible text.
E-T-03 — The Kuwahara E.T. - Early Model Differences - Factory Specs & Components
- The visible page heading is truncated after ‘Factory Specs & Comp…’ in the supplied full-page capture; the active tab visibly reads ‘FACTORY SPECS & COMPONENTS’.
E-T-03 — The Kuwahara E.T. - Early Model Differences - Factory Specs & Components
- The published phrase ‘There are 2 qualities welds at the BB area’ is preserved without correction.
E-T-03 — The Kuwahara E.T. - Early Model Differences - Factory Specs & Components
- The two solid-black media areas are recorded only as visibly supplied; no unavailable embed titles or channels were invented.
E-T-04 — The Kuwahara E.T. - Early Model Differences - Facts
- Published grammar, capitalization, model references, and repeated wording are preserved without silent correction, including ‘The ET similar to the KY-2,’ ‘KYZ’s,’ ‘which could not sell,’ and ‘as an KE-1.’
E-T-04 — The Kuwahara E.T. - Early Model Differences - Facts
- The two solid-black media areas are recorded only as visibly supplied; no unavailable embed titles or channels were invented.
E-T-04 — The Kuwahara E.T. - Early Model Differences - Facts
- The separately supplied chart file repeats the same published chart content associated with the preceding factory-specifications page but has its own filename and checksum.
E-T-05 — The Kuwahara E.T. - Early Model Differences - Notes
- The published wording uses ‘sought after ET’ without a hyphen and is preserved without silent correction.
E-T-05 — The Kuwahara E.T. - Early Model Differences - Notes
- No tab bar is visible in the supplied Notes-page capture; no unseen tabs or active-tab state were inferred.
E-T-05 — The Kuwahara E.T. - Early Model Differences - Notes
- The two solid-black media areas are recorded only as visibly supplied; no unavailable embed titles or channels were invented.
E-T-05 — The Kuwahara E.T. - Early Model Differences - Notes
- The separately supplied chart file repeats the same published 27-category comparison already transcribed under the Factory Specs & Components page but has its own filename and checksum.
E-T-06 — The Kuwahara E.T. - The First Replica
- The center navigation visibly says ‘2012 Replica (20th Anniversary) Bike’; this is preserved as published even though the 20th-anniversary page is titled 2002.
E-T-07 — The Kuwahara E.T. - 2002 Replica (20th Anniversary)
- The center navigation visibly says ‘2022 Replica (30th Anniversary) Bike’; the actual 30th-anniversary page title identifies 2012. Preserve the published navigation text.
E-T-08 — The Kuwahara E.T. - 2012 Replica (30th Anniversary)
- A stray visible ‘1-‘ appears at the upper left of the content area and is part of the source capture.
E-T-09 — The Kuwahara E.T. - 2022 Replica (40th Anniversary)
- The page title identifies the 2022 / 40th-anniversary replica, but the image caption visibly reads ‘The 40th Anniversary Replica (2012).’ Preserve both.
E-T-10 — Hedstrom E.T. BMX
- Earlier project decisions required non-Kuwahara E.T. bikes to remain clearly separated from the film-used Kuwahara bikes and rejected unsupported Murray, Huffy, or similar attributions.
E-T-10 — Hedstrom E.T. BMX
- The back-navigation visibly says ‘30th Anniversary’ even though the Hedstrom page follows the 40th-anniversary page in the supplied sequence.
RAD-01 — RAD
- The published release-date line says ‘March 21, 1982,’ while the visible embedded-video title identifies the trailer as 1986. Preserve both as displayed; do not silently reconcile the conflict.
RAD-04 — The Trial: Pre-Helltrack Disqualification - Hearing Exhibit C
- Exhibit C refers to ‘rider #33’ and Cru Jones as though they are separate riders, while Exhibits F and G explicitly identify Cru Jones as #33. Preserve the published wording and document the internal inconsistency.
RAD-09 — The Trial: Pre-Helltrack Disqualification - Closing Arguments
- The closing sentence visibly ends with two periods before the closing quotation mark: ‘Cru Jones should be disqualified..’ Preserve the published punctuation.
BMX-BANDITS-01 — BMX Bandits
- The left navigation visibly uses ‘Rad’, rather than the all-capital styling ‘RAD’ used on the RAD movie pages.
BMX-BANDITS-01 — BMX Bandits
- The release date and synopsis are preserved as published Lititz BMX content and are not independently verified in this source-processing pass.
BMX-BANDITS-01 — BMX Bandits
- The caption ‘Yes, that is Nicole Kidman…’ is preserved verbatim, including the ellipsis.
BMX-BANDITS-01 — BMX Bandits
- The page contains one visible YouTube embed and no separate standalone page image.